Full diagnosis, ranked fixes, and a Version 2 plan.
Generate rating
Upload your track here
or click to browse · MP3, WAV, M4A
15 free credits
AI song rater for tracks you actually want to release.
Upload a track and get a 0–100 score, 3 concrete fixes, and a V2 comparison so you know if the next version improved.
You've already tried asking AI to rate your song.
A useful review gives you specific observations to check against the recording. The cards below illustrate feedback formats; they are not results from a controlled comparison of current tools.
"Your song has excellent production quality! The mix sounds clean and professional with a good balance between instruments. I'd rate it an 8/10. The tempo feels like around 120 BPM and the key appears to be C major. Great work!"
Illustration: praise without a specific passage to check.
"This is a really solid track! I'd give it a 78/100. The production is impressive, great stereo separation and the mix feels professional. The melody is catchy and the vocal sits nicely. Minor note: the bridge could use more dynamic contrast. Overall, great work!"
Illustration: a suggestion without a clear place to start.
63/100. Low-end buildup below 200Hz is masking the kick in the chorus. Vocal sits 2–3dB behind the synth lead from 1:42–2:18. Pre-chorus transition at 1:15 drops energy instead of building it. Hook melody resolves too early, payoff lands on beat 1 instead of sustaining through beat 2.
Illustration: specific claims to check against the recording.
RMS provides a dedicated workflow for an uploaded recording: score breakdowns, written feedback tied to sections, and linked revisions. When comparing reviews, use the same audio and a clear question, then check the recommendations against what you can hear and change.
For an example you can hear, read how to get useful feedback on your song. It includes the recording, the advice RMS gave us, and the limits of the resulting score comparison.
How it works
Upload any song
Drag and drop an MP3, WAV, or M4A. Works with demos, finished masters, generator exports, and DAW bounces. If it is audio, it works.
Get your score in 30 seconds
Our ML pipeline analyzes the raw audio waveform, not metadata, not your filename, and returns a 0–100 score with a four-factor breakdown: Sound Quality, Hit Potential, Broad Appeal, and Overall.
See what to fix in the next version
AI feedback breaks your song into segments (intro, verse, chorus, bridge, outro) and gives you your top 3 prioritized fixes. Revise, re-upload, and watch the number move.
What you get back
0–100 Score: Is This Generation Worth Keeping?
One number that tells you where your track stands. The overall score comes from a four-factor audio model: Production Quality, Catchiness, Distinctiveness, and Genre Competitiveness. The result page also shows three readable summaries: Sound Quality, Hit Potential, and Broad Appeal. Stop guessing whether generation 3 or generation 7 is better. Now you know.
Segment-by-Segment AI Feedback
Your song gets analyzed section by section. The AI listens to your intro, verses, choruses, bridge, and outro individually and tells you what's working and what isn't. You'll see specific observations about instrumentation, arrangement, vocal treatment, energy flow, and transitions, not generic platitudes. The feedback references actual timestamps so you can jump to the exact moment it's talking about.
Top 3 Fixes
After analyzing your track, the AI prioritizes the three changes that would have the biggest impact on your score. These aren't abstract suggestions like "improve the mix." They're concrete and actionable: tighten the low-end below 200 Hz, add a pre-chorus build, bring the vocal forward 2 dB in the chorus. Use them to revise the mix, arrangement, lyrics, or prompt.
Revision Tracking: Revise, Re-upload, Re-score
Changed the mix, lyrics, arrangement, or prompt? Upload the new version and see exactly how the score moved. Rate My Song AI tracks your revision history and shows you a score trajectory across versions, so you can see if your changes are actually working.
Upload. Score. Revise. Repeat.
The feedback loop for music creators. Every version is tracked. Every change is measured.
Questions
You upload an MP3, WAV, or M4A file. Our ML pipeline analyzes the raw audio waveform and scores it with four model factors: Production Quality, Catchiness, Distinctiveness, and Genre Competitiveness. The page then shows an overall score plus three readable summaries: Sound Quality, Hit Potential, and Broad Appeal. On top of that, an AI model analyzes your song segment by segment (intro, verse, chorus, bridge, outro) and gives you specific, actionable feedback on what's working and what to fix. The whole process takes about 30 seconds.
RMS provides a dedicated workflow for an uploaded recording: score breakdowns, written feedback tied to sections, and linked revisions. When comparing reviews, use the same audio and a clear question, then check the recommendations against what you can hear and change.
Your overall score (0–100) comes from a four-factor audio model: Production Quality, Catchiness, Distinctiveness, and Genre Competitiveness. The result page also shows three readable summaries: Sound Quality, Hit Potential, and Broad Appeal. The current headline score is weighted most toward Genre Competitiveness. A score in the 30s–40s is typical for a first upload. Scores above 60 indicate stronger production and composition. The summaries show which areas are pulling the score up or down, so you know where to focus your effort.
The scoring pipeline doesn't rate "how AI-generated" your track sounds. It evaluates the audio on the same dimensions that matter whether a human or an AI made it: sound quality, hook strength, broad listener appeal, and overall competitiveness. A track with muddy low-end scores lower on Sound Quality than one with a clean mix, regardless of how it was made. The ML models are trained on real music data and measure actual audio properties from the waveform, not metadata about the creation process.
Yes. You can rate my music with AI by uploading an MP3, WAV, or M4A. The AI music rater analyzes the audio itself and returns a repeatable 0–100 rating, section-level feedback, and prioritized fixes. You can also use it to rate my track, beat, or mix.
You get 15 free credits when you sign up, no credit card required—enough for three Deep ratings. Deep ratings cost 5 credits, Fast ratings cost 3, and revisions cost 1. When your credits run out, add a one-time credit pack or choose the separate Songbird workflow.
Most "AI song raters" are thin wrappers around ChatGPT: they send your filename or a text description to an LLM and return a generic response. They can't actually hear your music. Rate My Song AI runs your audio through a dedicated ML pipeline that produces consistent, repeatable scores from the actual waveform. You also get segment-by-segment analysis, prioritized fixes, and revision tracking so you can upload a new version and see exactly how your score changed. No other tool does this.
Guides and score research
See what the score means, what strong songs share, and how to decide which version is worth keeping.
AI Song Feedback
A clear outside read on hook, structure, production, and what to try next. Built for any audio file you want to improve.
Song scores and Spotify streams
What a study of 69,739 released tracks found about song ratings and Spotify streams, including the exceptions and limits.
What Scores Mean
The four signals behind your score: production quality, catchiness, distinctiveness, and genre competitiveness.
Compare Versions
See why version history matters and how real improvement shows up when you score each pass instead of guessing.
Find out before you upload to Spotify.
Get a real score in 30 seconds. 15 free credits—enough for 3 Deep ratings. No credit card.
Drop your track here
or click to browse · MP3, WAV, M4A